Modash Alternatives: 11 Top Competitors Compared (2026)
I compared the top Modash alternatives on starting price, profile database size, fake follower analysis, audience overlap, reporting, and trial access. Modash starts at $199/mo. ClickAnalytic starts at $79/mo, includes 400M+ influencer profiles, AQS fake follower scoring, audience overlap analysis, white-label reports, campaign tracking with UTMs, and Shopify revenue attribution.
Reviewed by Paul Boulet, founder of ClickAnalytic. He has spent years building and testing influencer marketing tools across agencies and brand teams.
Ready to move on from Modash?
ClickAnalytic starts at $79/mo. Get access to 400M+ creator profiles, AQS fake follower scoring, audience overlap analysis, and Shopify revenue attribution. No annual contract. 7-day free trial.
The Reviews
Each tool tested against real agency use cases. Pricing verified April 2026.
1. ClickAnalytic ⭐
Price: Free trial (no credit card) then from $79/mo | Database: 400M+ profiles | Free trial: Yes, no CC required
ClickAnalytic is built for teams that need discovery, vetting, reporting, and campaign tracking in one self-serve workflow. The core difference versus Modash is feature depth at the entry tier. ClickAnalytic starts at $79/mo and includes 400M+ profiles, AQS fake follower scoring, audience overlap analysis, white-label reports, campaign tracking with UTMs, and Shopify revenue attribution. Modash starts at $199/mo, and content tracking plus email finder typically require the $499+/mo tier. The no-credit-card free trial also removes the 20-profile-open cap that limits Modash evaluation. The clearest limitation is channel coverage. ClickAnalytic does not cover Pinterest, Twitch, or Twitter/X, so teams running multi-platform programs outside Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube may need a second tool.
2026 update: ClickAnalytic expanded white-label options and improved search depth for niche creator categories this year, which makes agency handoff much smoother.
- 400M+ profiles, larger than Modash’s 380M+ database
- $79/mo entry price, 60% lower than Modash’s $199/mo starting plan
- AQS fake follower scoring and audience overlap analysis included
- White-label reports included for agency client delivery
- Self-serve sign-up and free trial with no credit card required
- No Pinterest, Twitch, or Twitter/X coverage
- API access and advanced enterprise features require higher tiers
- Lower brand recognition than HypeAuditor or Traackr in enterprise procurement
- Software-only product, not a managed service
- Enterprise buyers comparing Fortune 500 vendors may still request a demo process
Geschikt voor: Agencies, challenger brands, and in-house teams that want 400M+ profile discovery, white-label reporting, and AQS plus overlap analysis from $79/mo.
2. HypeAuditor
Price: From $299/mo (billed annually, contact sales) | Database: 224M+ profiles | Free trial: No, demo required | G2: 4.6/5 (150+ reviews)
HypeAuditor is built for teams that care most about audience quality analysis before they approve a creator. Its signature differentiator is AQS, Audience Quality Score, which flags suspicious follower patterns, engagement anomalies, and growth spikes across 5 platforms: Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Twitter/X, and Twitch. At 224M+ profiles and $299+/mo, it is more specialized than Modash’s $199/mo discovery-first positioning. The main limitation is workflow fit. HypeAuditor is strongest when you already have a shortlist and need deeper fraud screening. It is less practical for teams that want self-serve discovery plus outreach and reporting in one lower-cost system. Demo-required access also slows evaluation compared with ClickAnalytic or Modash self-serve sign-up.
2026 update: HypeAuditor doubled down on fraud and audience quality analysis this year, but pricing pressure is now one of the biggest themes in buyer feedback.
- AQS flags suspicious follower patterns, engagement anomalies, and growth spikes
- 224M+ profiles across 5 platforms
- Stronger audience quality analysis depth than Modash
- Useful for pre-contract creator vetting on high-budget campaigns
- Well-known vendor for risk-conscious brand teams
- Starts at $299+/mo, 50% higher than Modash’s $199/mo entry price
- Demo required for enterprise evaluation
- Better at validation than full campaign workflow management
- Less self-serve than Modash or ClickAnalytic
- Teams comparing multiple vendors may see engagement-rate differences between tools
Geschikt voor: Brands and agencies that need AQS-based fraud detection, suspicious follower analysis, and audience quality screening before creator approval.
3. Upfluence
Price: Custom (~$478+/mo publicly referenced, demo required) | Database: 12M+ enriched profiles | Free trial: No | G2: 4.5/5 (140+ reviews)
Upfluence is built for ecommerce teams that want influencer workflows tied directly to store data and affiliate tracking. Its main differentiators are 500+ ecommerce integrations and native connections with Shopify, WooCommerce, and BigCommerce. That makes it a better fit than Modash for DTC brands that need creator discovery, affiliate links, and store-side attribution in one system. The limitation is analytics depth and buying friction. Pricing is custom, demo required, and public references cluster around $478+/mo, while audience quality analysis is lighter than HypeAuditor and there is no audience overlap analysis. Upfluence is practical for ecommerce operators. It is less practical for agencies or brands that mainly need broad discovery and self-serve testing.
2026 update: Upfluence has pushed ecommerce and affiliate workflows further this year, but the core buying decision still comes down to whether you need store integrations enough to accept demo-only acquisition and a smaller 12M+ database.
- 500+ ecommerce integrations
- Native Shopify, WooCommerce, and BigCommerce connections
- Affiliate tracking built in for DTC and ambassador programs
- Better ecommerce workflow depth than Modash
- Useful for brands tying creator activity to store revenue
- Custom pricing and demo required
- 12M+ database is much smaller than Modash’s 380M+ and ClickAnalytic’s 400M+
- No audience overlap analysis
- Audience quality analysis is lighter than HypeAuditor
- Less suitable for agencies that need self-serve multi-client workflows
Geschikt voor: Ecommerce and DTC brands using Shopify, WooCommerce, or BigCommerce that need affiliate tracking and store integrations more than broad discovery scale.
4. Aspire
Price: From ~$2,000/mo (annual contract) | Database: Creator marketplace + product seeding workflows | Free trial: No | G2: 4.8/5 (40+ reviews)
Aspire is built for DTC and ecommerce brands running gifting, product seeding, creator marketplace recruitment, and affiliate link tracking in one program. Its differentiators are the gifting marketplace and product seeding workflow, which make it more operations-heavy than Modash’s discovery-first model. Pricing is custom at roughly $2,000+/mo, demo required, and onboarding is heavier than self-serve tools. That makes Aspire a fit for brands with dedicated creator operations teams and repeat product-send workflows. The main limitation is accessibility. Smaller brands and agencies usually do not need a $2,000+/mo platform plus heavy onboarding just to run discovery and outreach.
2026 update: Aspire improved marketplace workflow efficiency this year, but payment and onboarding complexity remain the main operational tradeoffs for global teams.
- Gifting marketplace and product seeding workflows built in
- Affiliate link tracking supports DTC creator commerce programs
- Better fit than Modash for brands shipping product at scale
- Designed for always-on creator programs, not one-off discovery
- Marketplace model can reduce sourcing time for brands with strong inbound demand
- Custom pricing starts around $2,000+/mo
- Demo required and onboarding is heavier than self-serve tools
- No audience overlap analysis
- No free trial for hands-on testing
- Not practical for SMBs or agencies that mainly need discovery and reporting
Geschikt voor: Mid-market DTC and ecommerce brands that need gifting, product seeding, and affiliate tracking in a single creator operations workflow.
Looking for the full comparison? See our best Aspire alternatives ranked by pricing, audience analytics, and agency workflow fit.
5. GRIN
Price: From $399/mo, 30-day limited trial, demo required | Database: 190M+ profiles | Free trial: Yes, limited | G2: 4.5/5 (300+ reviews)
GRIN is built for DTC brand teams that want a creator CRM more than a discovery-first search engine. Its differentiators are CRM modules for gifting, product seeding, creator contracts, and creator payments. That makes it useful for brands managing repeat ambassador programs and product-send workflows after creators are already in the system. Pricing starts at $399+/mo, the 30-day trial is limited, and a demo is still required. The main limitation for agencies is workspace structure. GRIN does not offer white-label reporting or a multi-client workspace, so it is better suited to one brand team than to agencies juggling several client accounts.
2026 update: GRIN has continued refining CRM workflows this year, but discovery expectations remain the biggest mismatch in buyer reviews.
- CRM modules for gifting, product seeding, contracts, and creator payments
- 190M+ profiles is enough for many DTC programs
- 30-day limited trial gives some hands-on access
- Better than Modash for brands prioritizing creator relationship management
- Useful for repeat ambassador and affiliate-style programs
- Starts at $399+/mo, roughly 2x Modash’s $199/mo entry price
- No white-label reporting
- No multi-client workspace for agencies
- Demo required despite the limited trial
- Blog traffic is 69% content-led and skews celebrity entertainment, which says less about product education depth
Geschikt voor: DTC brand teams that need gifting, contracts, payments, and creator CRM modules more than agency reporting or multi-client account structure.
Find the right creator. No credit card to start.
Test the full platform with real data before paying anything. 400M+ profiles, no demo call required.
6. Traackr
Price: Custom pricing, typically $30K-$100K/year | Database: 7M influencers | Free trial: No, demo only | G2: 4.3/5 (60+ reviews)
Traackr is built for global enterprise brands running multi-market influencer programs that need governance, approval controls, and spend accountability. Its differentiators are spend reporting across markets, approval workflows, compliance controls, and multi-market campaign oversight. That makes it a different product category from Modash. Traackr is not trying to win on self-serve discovery or low entry price. It is trying to help Fortune 500 teams standardize influencer operations across regions. The main limitation is practicality for smaller teams. Pricing typically lands between $30K and $100K per year, acquisition is demo-only, and onboarding often takes 6 to 12 weeks. With only 7M profiles, it is also much smaller than discovery-led tools like Modash or ClickAnalytic.
2026 update: Traackr leaned further into enterprise measurement and governance this year, while implementation time and demo-only acquisition remained the biggest barriers for agencies and SMBs.
- Spend reporting across markets for global program accountability
- Approval workflows and compliance controls for enterprise governance
- Multi-market campaign oversight for regional teams
- Better fit than Modash for Fortune 500 governance requirements
- Designed for procurement-approved enterprise rollouts
- $30K-$100K/year pricing puts it outside most SMB and agency budgets
- Demo-only acquisition with no self-serve trial
- Typical onboarding takes 6 to 12 weeks
- 7M-profile database is small versus Modash’s 380M+ and ClickAnalytic’s 400M+
- Not practical for teams that need fast setup and broad discovery
Geschikt voor: Global enterprise brands running multi-market influencer programs that need governance, approval workflows, and spend reporting across regions.
7. Influencer Hero
Price: From $649/mo (monthly) / $454/mo (annual) | Database: 450M claimed / 16M with full analytics | Free trial: Geen
Influencer Hero is built for outreach-heavy teams that want prospecting and communication in one place. Its differentiators are free tools such as a fake follower scanner and engagement calculator, plus outreach workflows that appeal to agencies running high-volume creator contact. The main limitation is analytics depth. Compared with HypeAuditor or ClickAnalytic, Influencer Hero offers less audience analysis depth, and the headline database claim of 450M profiles matters less than the smaller subset with full analytics coverage. At $649/mo with no free trial, it is also a more expensive starting point than Modash or ClickAnalytic.
2026 update: Influencer Hero kept expanding free-tool visibility this year, but buyers still ask for clearer separation between total profile claims and profiles with full analytics coverage.
- Free tools include a fake follower scanner and engagement calculator
- Useful for outreach-heavy agency workflows
- Niche top-influencer list content helps top-of-funnel discovery
- Claimed 450M profile coverage supports broad initial search
- Better fit than Modash for teams prioritizing outreach volume over analytics depth
- Less analytics depth than HypeAuditor or ClickAnalytic
- No audience overlap analysis
- No free trial
- Starts at $649/mo, over 3x Modash’s $199/mo entry price
- Total profile claim is less useful than the smaller subset with full analytics coverage
Geschikt voor: Agencies running high-volume creator outreach that need prospecting tools and basic vetting more than deep audience analytics.
8. Later Influence
Price: Custom for creator marketplace, scheduling plans from $16.67/mo | Database: Self-listed creator marketplace | Free trial: No | G2: 4.0/5 (20+ reviews)
Later is primarily a social media scheduling platform, with paid scheduling plans starting at $16.67/mo, and a creator marketplace added on top. Its creator discovery is based on self-listed creators, which makes it more comparable to a marketplace than to a full influencer intelligence platform. That setup works for teams that already use Later for scheduling and want basic creator discovery in the same tool. The main limitation is analytics depth. Later does not offer fake follower detection, audience overlap analysis, or AQS scoring, and engagement tracking is limited compared with dedicated influencer platforms. Discovery is also thinner than Modash because the marketplace depends on self-listed creators rather than a broad indexed database.
2026 update: Later kept bundling creator workflows more tightly with scheduling this year, but it remains a better fit for teams that want one social tool with basic creator discovery than for teams that need fraud analysis or deep search.
- Scheduling plans start at $16.67/mo
- Useful for teams that already use Later for social publishing
- Self-listed creator marketplace can cover basic brand partnerships
- Combines scheduling and creator discovery in one interface
- Lower entry cost than dedicated influencer suites
- No fake follower detection
- No audience overlap analysis
- No AQS scoring
- Discovery limited to self-listed creators
- Engagement tracking is lighter than dedicated influencer platforms
Geschikt voor: Social teams that already need scheduling and want basic creator discovery in the same platform, without paying for enterprise influencer analytics.
9. Impulze.ai
Price: Free trial (14 days, no CC) then from $89/mo | Database: 280M+ profiles | Free trial: Yes, 14 days, no CC
Impulze.ai is built for smaller teams that want low-cost discovery with a self-serve trial. At $89/mo with a 14-day no-credit-card trial and 280M+ profiles, it is one of the cheaper ways to access a large creator database. Its browser extension is the clearest differentiator for teams doing research directly on social platforms. The main limitation is the credit model. Search allowances reset monthly, which can be restrictive for agencies that source in bursts or across several client accounts. Compared with Modash, Impulze.ai wins on trial openness and price. Compared with ClickAnalytic or HypeAuditor, it offers less analytics depth.
2026 update: Impulze.ai improved extension usability this year, but the credit-based model is still the main friction point for active agency teams.
- $89/mo entry price
- 14-day free trial with no credit card
- 280M+ profiles
- Browser extension supports day-to-day creator research
- Lower starting cost than Modash’s $199/mo plan
- Credit-based search can limit heavy sourcing weeks
- Monthly credit reset is awkward for uneven workloads
- No audience overlap analysis
- Less analytics depth than HypeAuditor or ClickAnalytic
- Agencies producing frequent exports can outgrow the pricing model quickly
Geschikt voor: Small brands, freelancers, and lean agencies that want a 14-day self-serve trial, 280M+ profiles, and a lower monthly entry price than Modash.
10. Tagger by Sprout Social
Price: Custom (~$1,599/seat/mo, annual contract) | Database: 9M+ profiles | Free trial: No | G2: 4.3/5 (80+ reviews)
Tagger by Sprout Social is built for enterprise social teams that want influencer discovery tied to social listening. Its differentiator is the connection between creator search and broader conversation data inside the Sprout ecosystem. That matters for teams selecting creators based on brand mentions, audience conversation, and trend signals rather than pure profile search. The main limitation is price-to-database ratio. At roughly $1,599 per seat per month on an annual contract and 9M+ profiles, it is expensive relative to discovery-led tools with much larger databases. It also lacks the self-serve evaluation path that smaller teams usually want.
2026 update: Sprout has continued smoothing the Tagger transition this year, but the core buying case is still strongest for teams already invested in Sprout’s social listening stack.
- Influencer discovery tied to social listening data
- Useful for enterprise brand strategy teams already using Sprout
- Supports broader social workflow alignment than standalone influencer tools
- Can inform creator selection with conversation and trend signals
- Better fit than Modash for teams centered on social listening
- About $1,599 per seat per month on annual terms
- 9M+ profiles is small for the price
- No free trial
- Annual contract raises commitment before hands-on validation
- Less cost-efficient for teams that mainly want discovery and outreach
Geschikt voor: Enterprise social teams already using Sprout Social that want influencer discovery connected directly to social listening and trend analysis.
Which One Is Right for You?
If Modash already fits your workflow, there are clear reasons to stay. It offers 380M+ profiles, self-serve sign-up, and practical discovery-first workflows from $199/mo. If you need content tracking and email finder, budget for the $499+/mo tier. If you are still evaluating, ClickAnalytic is easier to test seriously. At $79/mo, it gives you 400M+ creator profiles, AQS fake follower scoring, audience overlap analysis, white-label reports, campaign tracking with UTMs, Shopify revenue attribution, and a free trial with no credit card. If your main hesitation with Modash is that key features sit on the higher tier and agencies cannot white-label outputs, the tradeoff is straightforward: keep the discovery-first tool you know, or switch to a lower-cost platform with broader reporting and vetting features included earlier.
Veelgestelde vragen
Related: Best Later Influence Alternatives · Best Impact Alternatives · Best Collabstr Alternatives
What are the biggest reasons people leave Modash?
Does Modash have a free version?
Which Modash alternative has the largest influencer database?
Is HypeAuditor better than Modash?
Which Modash alternative is best for agencies?
Is Modash worth the price?
Before You Move Off Modash
- Check which features you actually use today and which plan they require. Some teams start on the $199 Essentials tier, then realize the workflow they need pushes them to the $499+ tier for content tracking and email finder.
- Review how much testing your team completed during the Modash trial. A 20-profile-open cap can prevent a real side-by-side evaluation.
- Export any saved creator lists, campaign notes, tags, or historical comparisons before canceling. Make sure you know what can be downloaded and what stays locked inside the account.
- Map your current process from discovery to shortlist to outreach handoff. Rebuild that workflow in the new platform first so your team does not lose speed during migration.
5 Smart Questions to Ask in Any Platform Demo
- What is included in the base price, and which core features only unlock on higher tiers?
- How does the trial work in practice? Are there limits on searches, profile views, exports, or team access?
- What signals do you use to evaluate creator authenticity, and can I see how fake follower or quality scoring is explained inside the product?
- Can the platform show audience overlap between creators so we can reduce duplication before a campaign goes live?
- If we build lists and reports here, what data can we export later and how easy is it to move our workflow if our needs change?
Why Better Data Matters More Than Bigger AI Claims
Most influencer platforms now talk about AI, but labels matter less than the underlying data and scoring logic. Modash has a strong market presence with DR 73 and 380M+ profiles, but buyers still need to compare what each platform actually exposes inside the product. That matters because creator quality is uneven at scale. In our data, only 1% of Instagram creators have 90%+ real followers, and 44.1% are dormant. If a platform cannot help you filter that reality with clear signals, extra automation will not fix the shortlist.
The practical question is not who mentions AI most often. It is whether the platform helps you find active, brand-ready creators faster, with signals you can trust. ClickAnalytic combines a 400M+ profile database with AQS fake follower detection and audience overlap analysis so teams can validate creator quality before outreach starts.
Try ClickAnalytic free with no credit card and no trial cap.