Jake Paul’s AI Gambit: Investments and Deepfake

What’s going on about Jake Paul and Sora?

Jake Paul, known for his YouTube career and boxing prowess, has taken a deep dive into the world of generative AI.

He has actively invested in AI-driven firms and embraced the novel video-creation app Sora, letting his likeness be remixed, imitated and monetised.

This move places him at the intersection of creator economy, deepfake culture and identity monetisation.

The investments and tech backing

Through his venture vehicle Anti Fund (which he co-founded), Paul lists AI, robotics and software as core themes.

Specifically, Anti Fund publicly states investments in companies including OpenAI and Anduril Industries.

While independent verification of Paul’s direct equity in OpenAI remains limited, his association via investment firm backing adds credibility to claims that he is financially involved in the AI ecosystem.

His involvement in platforms like Sora (below) underscores that this is more than passive financial exposure—it’s an active strategic play.

The Sora deep-fake experiment, what Paul is doing

Paul openly opted into Sora’s “cameo”-style video features. In one widely reported instance, users created Sora-videos of Paul in unexpected roles: modelling makeup, adopting different genders, even putting on dresses.

Rather than resisting these clones, Paul appears to lean in. According to coverage:

• He posted a video applying makeup himself, directly referencing the AI-generated versions of him.

• He publicly challenged others: “I’m gonna be suing everybody that is continuing to spread these false narratives of me doing s*** that I would literally never, ever do,” even as he referenced the clips in jest.

• Observers suggest this behavior is part of a broader strategy: positioning his persona and likeness as directly monetisable via new AI tools.

Why this matters and the risks

Creator economy & identity monetisation

Paul’s approach signals a shift: reputational identity isn’t just content, it’s a licensable asset. By pushing his likeness into the AI playground, he effectively bets that his brand can be remixed, replayed, and monetised via third-party tools.

If it works, he gains attention, new revenue streams, and cultural positioning.

Deepfake ethics & rights of likeness

But the flip side is fraught. Sora and similar tools allow for ultra-realistic impersonations, raising questions about consent, identity misuse and brand dilution.

While Paul opted in, many public figures did not — and Sora’s guardrails have already been flagged as weak.

Financial and regulatory implications

With identity now a potential commodity, we may see new legal/regulatory frameworks emerge around “renting your face” and “licensing your likeness for generative AI use.”

Paul may be ahead of the curve, but the infrastructure (contracts, rights, royalties) is still nascent.

What to watch next

• Whether Paul (or Anti Fund) publicly confirms a specific equity stake in OpenAI or a related venture.
• The monetisation model: Will Paul’s likeness become a commodity users pay to access via Sora-type tools?

• How other creators respond: Will we see a wave of “opt-in your face” deals or push-back and legal action?

• Regulatory moves: Given the rapid pace of creator-led deepfake usage, lawmakers may soon jump into the space with new rules around consent, royalty and branding.

Jake Paul’s AI move is more than a stunt—it’s a high-stakes experiment in the economics of identity.

Whether this pays off or backfires, it highlights a major shift: in the creator era, your face may soon be both your brand e your business.

Sources

• Complex 
• Futurism
• Scientific American
• TIME
• New York Post
• Business Insider